One of the main culprits for the pollution of potable and natural water sources is arsenic, an abundant and toxic element in the earth’s crust. Arsenic is currently known as the cause of groundwater contamination in more than 100 countries—and can produce life-threatening diseases, especially for populations in developing countries. Such circumstances necessitate efficient and reliable arsenic detection methods for water, food and soil. A team of French scientists have used surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) to detect arsenic, even at very low concentrations.
“Arsenic exists in water in different forms, so it is important to be able to quantify the species, in addition to the global content”, said author Dominique Vouagner. “By using SERS, we can detect and speciate pollutants even at the lowest concentration. This includes arsenic, which should not exceed 10 ppb, as per the World Health Organization’s recommendations.”
The team compared the detection and speciation performances of two SERS substrates. One was prepared by conventional thermal evaporation, where material is heated until it vaporises. The other was created with an electroless process, in which a coating is deposited on a material by submerging it in a liquid and instigating a chemical reaction. The latter was revealed to be much more sensitive and is relatively easy and safe to produce, according to Vouagner.
“Our technique for developing this SERS substrate makes it simple to manufacture because the electroless films can be easily deposited on various substrates”, she said. “Plus, the starting compounds have low environmental toxicity, which is a benefit for detection measurements in natural as well as potable water.”
The technique is a departure from existing reference methods for trace arsenic speciation, which are time-consuming and expensive. Conventional methods also require sample pre-treatment in a lab, so they are not ideally suited to on-site field assays. Additionally, the new method employs the use of a solid substrate, which enables optical interrogation.
“Because they’re less ‘noisy’, optical detection systems are much more sensitive than electronic systems”, said author Bernard Dussardier. “At the same time, they’re less sensitive to parasitic electromagnetic fields. Also, the SERS technique allows direct physical-chemical property measurements, whereas electronic systems, and some other optical systems, are indirect.”
